In the sun-baked streets of Los Angeles, where working families grapple with crime, homelessness, and failing public services, a quiet network of billionaires is pouring millions into the campaigns of the very politicians who rail against wealth and capitalism.
Far from organic grassroots movements, these progressive bids for city attorney, council seats, and even mayoral influence are being fueled by out-of-town fortunes insulated from the policies they promote. This isn’t democracy in action—it’s elite capture dressed up as equity.
The pattern is unmistakable. Records reveal substantial funding streams flowing to candidates like Marissa Roy, Eunisses Hernandez, Faizah Malik, and Nithya Raman, whose platforms emphasize reduced policing, corporate tax hikes, and diversion programs over traditional law enforcement. These efforts, often routed through super PACs like the Smart Justice California Action Fund, bypass direct contribution limits and allow massive independent expenditures. The result is a city increasingly shaped not by its residents but by distant donors whose personal security details shield them from the consequences.
This funding web exposes a profound contradiction in modern progressivism. Candidates who campaign against “the rich” and “corporate power” eagerly accept resources from tech fortunes and inherited wealth. The same voices decrying income inequality partner with individuals whose combined net worths stretch into the billions. One wonders: if these policies truly served the working class, why must they be subsidized by those farthest removed from daily urban struggles?
The Cost of Elite-Driven Policies
Los Angeles has already tasted the fruit of this approach. In 2020, similar donor networks helped install District Attorney George Gascón, whose reform agenda coincided with sharp rises in property crimes and public disorder. Shoplifting reportedly surged by as much as 130 percent in certain periods, alongside increases in auto thefts and other offenses. Voters eventually rejected this experiment at the ballot box, yet the same financial architecture now targets additional levers of city power.
Local challengers have taken notice. Lou Calanche, running against Hernandez in Council District 1, pointedly observed the disconnect between working-class rhetoric and Bay Area bankrolling. Political observers note that these donors face none of the day-to-day realities—homeless encampments, strained emergency services, or neighborhood safety concerns—that ordinary Angelenos confront. Their influence operates at a remove, shaping policy without bearing its burdens.
Even more telling is how public financing mechanisms socialize the cost. Taxpayers effectively multiply these elite contributions, subsidizing campaigns that often prioritize ideological goals over pragmatic governance. This arrangement raises serious questions about accountability and whether local elections remain contests of ideas or simply auctions won by the highest external bidders.
Constitutional Principles and the Public Trust
At its core, this story touches on foundational American concerns about self-government and the dangers of concentrated influence. The Founders warned against factions and foreign or distant meddling precisely because representative institutions function best when tethered to the communities they serve. When policy is driven by those “behind golden gates,” as one recall organizer described, the social contract frays.
JD’s manually curated links for God-fearing MAGA patriots
The irony deepens when considering progressive rhetoric about “dark money” and “oligarchy.” Such critiques typically target conservative donors, yet evaporate when the funds flow leftward to advance criminal justice “reforms” that have demonstrably strained urban life. This selective outrage suggests the real objection isn’t to wealth in politics but to wealth that resists the approved ideological direction.
Los Angeles stands at a crossroads. Continued embrace of these externally financed experiments risks further eroding public safety and economic vitality. Residents deserve leaders accountable to their lived experiences rather than national progressive donor networks. The recent rejection of Gascón offers hope that voters can still course-correct, provided they see through the carefully cultivated narratives.
As Scripture reminds us in the book of James, “But the wisdom that is from above is first pure, then peaceable, gentle, and easy to be entreated, full of mercy and good fruits, without partiality, and without hypocrisy” (James 3:17).
True justice and effective governance cannot thrive amid such glaring inconsistencies between professed values and actual power structures.
The billionaire progressive pipeline in LA ultimately reveals more about modern leftism than its architects intend. It is less a movement of the people than a top-down project sustained by those who can afford ideological indulgence.
For a city weary of disorder and decline, recognizing this dynamic may prove the first step toward genuine renewal grounded in common sense, accountability, and respect for the communities actually living with the results.
Two Storms, One Harvest
Every food crisis in living memory has been a one-shock event. The 2008 price spike was a commodity bubble. The 2020 shortages were a logistics failure. The 2022 grain scare was a war on one exporter’s ports. Each time, the system bent, adjusted, and recovered, and each time the experts assured us afterward that global markets are simply too big and too diversified to fail.
What nobody in Washington seems eager to discuss is that 2026 is shaping up to be something the modern food system has never actually faced. Two independent shocks, one climatic and one geopolitical, are converging on the same harvest cycle at the same time. Not sequentially. Simultaneously.
Start with the weather. The Pacific Ocean is currently building toward what forecasters now openly call a record event. NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center puts the odds of at least a strong El Niño near 88 percent, with roughly two in three odds it reaches “very strong” status, the tier reserved for perhaps three or four events in the entire satellite era. Every major global model now projects a median peak in Super El Niño territory, and most of them project it exceeding the 2015-16 event, which until now held the modern record. Sea surface anomalies were already brushing the super threshold in mid-July, months before these events normally peak. The atmosphere has already shifted into El Niño mode, and the event is forecast to crest in late fall and early winter.
This is not about “climate change.” It’s about the standard cycles of weather, and the cycle we’re currently in is one that has likely devastated societies in the past. We’re better prepared as a society today, but not all Americans are equally prepared.
Serious households have started doing the quiet math on their own. Grocery bills tell part of the story, and the forecast maps tell the rest, which is why long-term food storage has moved from fringe hobby to mainstream line item in the family budget, with established suppliers like Heaven’s Harvest seeing demand from people who five years ago would have rolled their eyes at the idea. That instinct is not paranoia. It is pattern recognition, and the pattern is worth walking through carefully.
Editor’s Note: Heaven’s Harvest IS a sponsor, but the warnings of this article are real and would be written even if we didn’t have a survival food sponsor. With that said, those who take advantage of what they offer can use promo code “Patriot” for 15% off.
The Fertilizer Clock Is Already Running
While the Pacific warms, the second shock has been unfolding in the Strait of Hormuz. The conflict with Iran turned the world’s most important energy chokepoint into a contested waterway, and the consequences reach far beyond the gas pump. Roughly a third of global fertilizer trade moves through Hormuz, and the disruption sent urea prices up 86 percent year over year by March, with a 53 percent jump in a single month.
The World Bank projects energy prices rising about 24 percent in 2026 and fertilizer about 31 percent. By its own accounting, fertilizer prices ran 35 percent higher in the first five months of this year than the same period last year.
Here is the mechanism the nightly news will not explain. Fertilizer is not a grocery item. It is a time-delayed input. The nitrogen a farmer in Iowa or Punjab could not afford to apply this spring does not show up as a problem this spring. It shows up as a thinner harvest six to twelve months later.
The World Bank’s own food security brief concedes that the effects of reduced applications earlier this season “are likely to become visible only later in harvest outcomes.” Translate that from institutional language into plain English and it means this. The damage is already done, it is already in the ground, and we are simply waiting for it to arrive on the shelf.
Now check the calendar. Six to twelve months from the spring planting season lands us squarely in late 2026 and early 2027. Which is precisely when the strongest El Niño in the instrumental record is forecast to peak, bringing its signature droughts to Southeast Asia, Australia, southern Africa, northern Brazil, and South Asia, the very regions that grow the world’s rice, sugar, and oilseeds.
The World Bank warns openly that a strong El Niño “could disrupt multiple crop belts simultaneously” on top of the conflict-driven input costs. Their baseline projection assumes the Middle East disruptions ease by autumn. What in the last two years of Middle East history suggests that assumption is safe?
The System Has No Slack Left
The comfortable answer is that global markets always adjust. But adjustment requires slack, and the slack is gone. Global cereal production is expected to decline from last year’s records even before El Niño does its work. The UN World Food Programme, hardly a den of right-wing preppers, is calling this the most significant disruption to its supply chains since Covid and the invasion of Ukraine, and its supply chain director put the stakes bluntly.
Today’s supply chain challenges are tomorrow’s hunger crisis.
There is also a political dimension that markets cannot price. When food gets scarce, governments do not behave like economists. They behave like politicians. Export bans, hoarding mandates, and panic buying at the national level turned the modest rice shortfall of 2008 into a global crisis, and analysts are already warning that import-dependent nations are the first dominoes.
The 2015-16 Super El Niño, a far weaker event than what is now forecast, threw tens of millions into food stress across Africa and Asia. This one is projected to be stronger, and it arrives with fertilizer already rationed by price and shipping lanes already contested by missiles.
What Joseph Knew
Scripture does not treat preparation for lean years as faithlessness. It treats it as wisdom delivered in advance to those willing to act on it.
Behold, there come seven years of great plenty throughout all the land of Egypt: And there shall arise after them seven years of famine; and all the plenty shall be forgotten in the land of Egypt.
Joseph did not respond to that warning with a hashtag or a committee. He stored grain during the years of abundance, and when the famine came, Egypt stood while its neighbors begged. The lesson is not that famine is certain. It is that the time to prepare is precisely when preparation still looks optional.
Nobody who filled a pantry in a year of plenty has ever regretted it, and nobody standing in an empty aisle has ever been glad he waited for certainty.
None of this calls for panic, and panic is the enemy of sound judgment anyway. It calls for the same unglamorous prudence our grandparents considered ordinary. Keep some cash margin, know your local growers, and put real food in deep storage while it is cheap and available, because the entire arc of this story is that cheap and available is a closing window.
Families looking for a straightforward place to start can visit Heaven’s Harvest and use promo code Patriot for 15 percent off long-term storable food. The forecasts may yet soften, the strait may yet reopen, and we should pray they do. But hope is a fine thing to hold and a foolish thing to eat.
