Do you prefer direct links to content? Check out our brand new sister site at Uncanceled.news.
Here’s an update on the case of Twitter suppressing the New York Post’s “potentially harmful” article on Hunter Biden’s emails: Breaking News: The FEC ruled that Twitter’s decision in October to block an unsubstantiated article about President Biden’s son, Hunter Biden, did not violate election laws, according to a document obtained by The New York Times. https://t.co/EzFKKvQ7X2
— The New York Times (@nytimes) September 13, 2021 Sorry … to block what kind of article? NEWS: The FEC has dismissed claims that Twitter acted illegally when it blocked users from posting an unsubstantiated Hunter Biden article.
Decision not public yet but sets a precedent for future cases involving social media sites and federal campaigns. https://t.co/egdp3KY1HV
— Shane Goldmacher (@ShaneGoldmacher) September 13, 2021 The New York Times is evidently trying to set its own precedent, that inconvenient truths can be dismissed as “unsubstantiated.” NEW: Per FEC doc, Twitter says it was warned by federal law enforcement that “malign state actors” might hack and release materials — and that Hunter Biden might be a specific target https://t.co/egdp3KY1HV
— Shane Goldmacher (@ShaneGoldmacher) September 13, 2021 The suppression of the Hunter Biden story prompted a fury of conservative outrage.
But FEC, per document obtained by NYT, found that such decisions — when driven by commercial reasons — were allowed under the law. https://t.co/egdp3KY1HV
— Shane Goldmacher (@ShaneGoldmacher) September 13, 2021 “Conservatives pounced the suppression of a damning story about Hunter Biden.” As they should have, Shane.
And now, conservatives are pouncing on the New York Times for blatantly covering for a morally corrupt Joe Biden and his morally corrupt family. “An unsubstantiated article”? https://t.co/OFoNJths71
— Chuck Ross (@ChuckRossDC) September 13, 2021 “Unsubstantiated” — Cousin Danny in the Boro (@cuzzo_danny) September 13, 2021 Unsubstantiated? Are we still doing this? https://t.co/Rd1mVK11oV — Kenny has 2 podcasts now (@kchessor) September 13, 2021 Are we seriously still calling it an “unsubstantiated article” https://t.co/ZJleRcZSNK — Rachel Bovard (@rachelbovard) September 13, 2021 Is it unsubstantiated though?— Darren (@Darran31123261) September 13, 2021 But… the article wasn’t unsubstantiated. https://t.co/KGzHFuJIPE — RBe (@RBPundit) September 13, 2021 In fact: It’s astonishingly substantiated. https://t.co/sDx1pzCQRM — jimtreacher.substack.com (@jtLOL) September […]
All ORIGINAL content on this site is © 2021 NOQ Report. All REPUBLISHED content has received direct or implied permission for reproduction.
With that said, our content may be reproduced and distributed as long as it has a link to the original source and the author is credited prominently. We don’t mind you using our content as long as you help out by giving us credit with a prominent link. If you feel like giving us a tip for the content, we will not object!
JD Rucker – EIC