Click here to view original web page at www.lifenews.com
Multiple congressional Democrats renewed their threat to pack the Supreme Court if the justices do not rule against a Mississippi law limiting abortion.
“Chipping away at Roe v. Wade will precipitate a seismic movement to reform the Supreme Court,” Democratic Connecticut Sen. Richard Blumenthal told The Hill on Monday. The Supreme Court announced on May 17 that it would hear the case Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization , which addresses Mississippi’s ban on abortions after 15 weeks.
Upholding the Mississippi law “will inevitably fuel and drive an effort to expand the Supreme Court if this activist majority betrays fundamental constitutional principles,” Blumenthal continued.
The Connecticut Democrat has repeatedly changed his mind on court-packing, saying that “nothing is off the table” when Republicans confirmed Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court in October 2020. He said on May 18 that Democrats should only “approach the issue of expanding the Court with extreme caution.”
Democratic Rhode Island Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse , who often advocates court-packing, said that Democrats have “a whole array of options we’re looking at in the courts committee” if the Supreme Court upholds the Mississippi law.
Click here to sign up for pro-life news alerts from LifeNews.com
Even hearing the case “really enlivens the concerns that we have about the extent to which right-wing billionaire money has influenced the makeup of the court and may even be pulling strings at the court,” he continued.
Christian-Driven America-First Precious Metals.
Before markets collapse, the smart play is to move wealth or retirement to precious metals. Contact Genesis Gold now to make it happen smoothly with no hassles from a group driven by fellowship.
After opposing court-packing during the Democratic primaries, President Joe Biden refused to answer questions during the 2020 general election about whether or not he supported adding seats to the Supreme Court.
The president announced in April a commission that would explore adding seats to the Supreme Court and other potential changes.Congressional Democrats introduced bills in the House and the Senate that would increase the size of the Supreme Court from nine to 13 justices. The body has been composed of nine justices since 1869.New York Democratic Rep. Jerrold Nadler, a co-sponsor of the court-packing bill, said that the Supreme Court’s consideration of the Mississippi abortion case “further shows the need” for court-packing. LifeNews Note: Michael Ginsburg writes for Daily […]
Click here to view original web page at www.lifenews.com
Will America-First News Outlets Make it to 2023?
Things are looking grim for conservative and populist news sites.
There’s something happening behind the scenes at several popular conservative news outlets. 2021 was bad, but 2022 is proving to be disastrous for news sites that aren’t “playing ball” with the corporate media narrative. It’s being said that advertisers are cracking down, forcing some of the biggest ad networks like Google and Yahoo to pull their inventory from conservative outlets. This has had two major effects. First, it has cooled most conservative outlets from discussing “taboo” topics like Pandemic Panic Theater, voter fraud, or The Great Reset. Second, it has isolated those ad networks that aren’t playing ball.
Certain topics are anathema for most ad networks. Speaking out against vaccines or vaccine mandates is a certain path to being demonetized. Highlighting voter fraud in the 2020 and future elections is another instant advertising death penalty. Throw in truthful stories about climate change hysteria, Critical Race Theory, and the border crisis and it’s easy to understand how difficult it is for America-First news outlets to spread the facts, share conservative opinions, and still pay the bills.
Without naming names, I have been told of several news outlets who have been forced to either consolidate with larger organizations or who have backed down on covering certain topics out of fear of being “canceled” by the ad networks. I get it. This is a business for many of us and it’s not very profitable. Those of us who do this for a living are often barely squeaking by, so loss of additional revenue can often mean being forced to make cuts. That means not being able to cover the topics properly. Its a Catch-22: Tell the truth and lose the money necessary to keep telling the truth, or avoid the truth and make enough money to survive. Those who have chosen survival simply aren’t able to spread the truth properly.
We will never avoid the truth. The Lord will provide if it is His will. Our job is simply to share the facts, spread the Gospel, and educate as many Americans as possible while exposing the forces of evil.
To those who have the means, we ask that you please donate. We have options available now, but there is no telling when those options will cancel us. We have our GivingFuel page. There have been many who have been canceled by PayPal, but for now it’s still an option. Your generosity is what keeps these sites running and allows us to get the truth to the masses. We’ve had great success in growing but we know we can do more with your assistance.
Thank you, and God Bless!
JD Rucker
